What is the difference between CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan?

CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan are different tools with different strengths. The best choice depends on your workflow, budget, and whether you need features like 3D scanning, floor plan generation, GLA calculation, or design capabilities. This page breaks down a direct comparison.

Which is better for real estate appraisers — CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan?

Cubicasa and Getfloorplan serve different workflows. Cubicasa is better suited for one use case while Getfloorplan fits another — the right choice depends on whether you need field capture or office-based GLA calculation from existing floor plans.

Can CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan be used together?

Cubicasa and Getfloorplan can complement each other in some workflows — for example, using one for field capture and the other for GLA calculation and reporting. Check the comparison table above for specific integration details.

How much does CubiCasa cost compared to GetFloorPlan?

CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan have different pricing models — one may charge per user, per project, or via annual subscription, while the other may offer a free tier or pay-per-use option. Check the comparison table above for current pricing details and which offers better value for your volume of work.

Which is easier to use — CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan?

Ease of use depends on your starting point. CubiCasa tends to fit one type of user or workflow, while GetFloorPlan is designed for another. If you are working from an existing floor plan PDF and need to calculate square footage quickly, a browser-based tool like PlanSnapper may reduce the learning curve entirely — no software installation required.

Do I need CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan if I already have a floor plan PDF?

If you already have a floor plan as a PDF or image, you may not need either tool. PlanSnapper lets you upload the PDF directly and trace walls in your browser to calculate GLA — no software installation required. Both CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan are most useful for creating sketches from scratch or capturing measurements in the field.

Which works better for calculating GLA — CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan?

Both CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan can support GLA calculation, but the workflow differs. One may require field measurement and sketch entry while the other may allow importing existing floor plans. If your starting point is an existing PDF or image floor plan, PlanSnapper provides a faster path — upload, trace, and get the GLA figure without entering either tool's workflow.

How do CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan handle existing floor plan PDFs?

Neither CubiCasa nor GetFloorPlan is primarily designed to import and calculate square footage from an existing PDF floor plan. Both tools are built around creating or capturing floor plans from scratch. If you already have a PDF floor plan, PlanSnapper lets you upload it directly, trace the walls, and get an accurate GLA figure without redrawing anything.

Which is better for occasional users — CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan?

CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan are both specialized tools with learning curves that reward regular use. Occasional users often find dedicated subscription tools hard to justify. For someone who needs to calculate square footage a few times a month, PlanSnapper is designed for exactly that — no training required, no annual contract, upload and measure in minutes.

Compare · 5 min read

CubiCasa vs GetFloorPlan: Which Floor Plan Service Should You Use?

Both CubiCasa and GetFloorPlan let you capture a floor plan using a smartphone. Both produce a 2D floor plan image used in real estate listings and property reports. But they differ significantly in how they work, how accurate they are, and what the floor plan output is actually useful for.

The short version

CubiCasa: A dedicated floor plan scanning app that uses your phone's camera and AI to generate a measured 2D floor plan. Turnaround in 1 hour. Widely used in the US by listing agents and appraisers. Floor plans include room dimensions and square footage.
GetFloorPlan: A similar service — scan a property with your phone, receive a rendered floor plan within a few hours. More popular internationally. Offers 2D floor plans, 3D renders, and virtual tours as add-ons. Pricing and output quality is comparable to CubiCasa.

CubiCasa vs GetFloorPlan: at a glance

	CubiCasa	GetFloorPlan
Capture method	Smartphone camera + AI scan	Smartphone camera + AI scan
Turnaround	~1 hour	1–3 hours
2D floor plan	Yes — with dimensions	Yes — with dimensions
Square footage output	Yes — labeled on floor plan	Yes — labeled on floor plan
<Link href="/learn/ansi-z765-square-footage-standard">ANSI Z765</Link> compliance	Methodology consistent with ANSI	Not specifically marketed as ANSI-compliant
Pricing	~$15–$19/scan (varies)	~$19–$25/scan (varies)
US availability	Strong — US-focused	Available, but more international focus
MLS integration	Broad MLS integration	Limited US MLS integration
3D / virtual tour add-on	Limited	Yes — 3D renders and virtual tours
Best for	US listing agents, appraisers	International listings, agents wanting 3D visuals

Accuracy: how well do they measure?

Both services use computer vision to interpret room geometry from video walkthroughs. Neither uses dedicated hardware — accuracy depends on how well the app interprets the video footage and whether you walk slowly and cover all angles.

CubiCasa has published accuracy data suggesting results within 1–3% of field measurement on standard residential layouts. GetFloorPlan makes similar claims. In practice, both services can struggle with very small rooms, complex geometry, and spaces with irregular ceilings.

For appraisal purposes, neither service replaces a field measurement — appraisers use these floor plans as references and then verify or recalculate GLA using a measurement tool. That is where PlanSnapper fits in: upload the CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan image, trace the perimeter, and get a verified ANSI-compliant GLA figure.

Which is better for US real estate agents?

CubiCasa has a stronger footprint in the US market and better MLS integration. If you need a floor plan for a US listing, CubiCasa is the more practical choice — faster turnaround, more MLS systems accept the output, and more appraisers are familiar with the CubiCasa format.

GetFloorPlan is worth considering if you also want 3D visualization or a virtual tour in the same workflow, particularly for higher-end listings where additional visuals matter.

Which is better for appraisers?

Appraisers typically receive a CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan export from a listing agent and need to verify or recalculate GLA from it. The floor plan is the input — the appraiser still needs to trace the exterior perimeter and apply ANSI Z765 rules to get a defensible GLA figure.

Either floor plan works as input to PlanSnapper. Upload the image, trace the above-grade perimeter, set scale from a labeled dimension, and get ANSI-compliant GLA in under 2 minutes.

The bottom line

For US listing agents: CubiCasa is the default choice — faster turnaround, better MLS support, familiar to US appraisers.
For 3D visualization: GetFloorPlan offers more visual output options if you want renders or virtual tours alongside the floor plan.
For GLA verification from either: Upload the floor plan to PlanSnapper and calculate ANSI-compliant square footage from it.

Already have a CubiCasa or GetFloorPlan export?

Upload it to PlanSnapper to calculate verified ANSI-compliant GLA in under 2 minutes.

Try PlanSnapper — $9 day pass or $29/mo