What is the difference between Hover and Roofsnap?

Hover and Roofsnap are different tools with different strengths. The best choice depends on your workflow, budget, and whether you need features like 3D scanning, floor plan generation, GLA calculation, or design capabilities. This page breaks down a direct comparison.

Which is better for real estate appraisers — Hover or Roofsnap?

Hover and Roofsnap serve different workflows. Hover is better suited for one use case while Roofsnap fits another — the right choice depends on whether you need field capture or office-based GLA calculation from existing floor plans.

Can Hover and Roofsnap be used together?

Hover and Roofsnap can complement each other in some workflows — for example, using one for field capture and the other for GLA calculation and reporting. Check the comparison table above for specific integration details.

How much does Hover cost compared to Roofsnap?

Hover and Roofsnap have different pricing models — one may charge per user, per project, or via annual subscription, while the other may offer a free tier or pay-per-use option. Check the comparison table above for current pricing details and which offers better value for your volume of work.

Which is easier to use — Hover or Roofsnap?

Ease of use depends on your starting point. Hover tends to fit one type of user or workflow, while Roofsnap is designed for another. If you are working from an existing floor plan PDF and need to calculate square footage quickly, a browser-based tool like PlanSnapper may reduce the learning curve entirely — no software installation required.

Do I need Hover or Roofsnap if I already have a floor plan PDF?

If you already have a floor plan as a PDF or image, you may not need either tool. PlanSnapper lets you upload the PDF directly and trace walls in your browser to calculate GLA — no software installation required. Both Hover and Roofsnap are most useful for creating sketches from scratch or capturing measurements in the field.

Which works better for calculating GLA — Hover or Roofsnap?

Both Hover and Roofsnap can support GLA calculation, but the workflow differs. One may require field measurement and sketch entry while the other may allow importing existing floor plans. If your starting point is an existing PDF or image floor plan, PlanSnapper provides a faster path — upload, trace, and get the GLA figure without entering either tool's workflow.

How do Hover and Roofsnap handle existing floor plan PDFs?

Neither Hover nor Roofsnap is primarily designed to import and calculate square footage from an existing PDF floor plan. Both tools are built around creating or capturing floor plans from scratch. If you already have a PDF floor plan, PlanSnapper lets you upload it directly, trace the walls, and get an accurate GLA figure without redrawing anything.

Which is better for occasional users — Hover or Roofsnap?

Hover and Roofsnap are both specialized tools with learning curves that reward regular use. Occasional users often find dedicated subscription tools hard to justify. For someone who needs to calculate square footage a few times a month, PlanSnapper is designed for exactly that — no training required, no annual contract, upload and measure in minutes.

Compare · 5 min read

Hover vs RoofSnap: Aerial Measurement for Roofing Contractors Compared

Hover and RoofSnap both help roofing contractors measure and estimate jobs without climbing on every roof. The data collection method is different — Hover uses photos you take on-site, RoofSnap pulls from existing aerial imagery. Here is how to decide which fits your workflow.

How each tool works

Hover uses photos you capture from ground level with your smartphone — typically 8 to 12 photos from different angles around the structure. Hover processes those into a 3D model and automatically calculates roof, siding, and window measurements. You get dimensions, materials estimates, and a 3D visualization. Accuracy depends on photo quality and coverage.

RoofSnap pulls pre-existing aerial and satellite imagery of the address and lets you trace the roof outline to generate a diagram and pitch data. You can also add manual measurements. Reports are formatted for insurance claims and contractor estimates. No site visit required for the measurement step.

Hover vs RoofSnap: at a glance

	Hover	RoofSnap
Data source	Photos you take on-site	Aerial/satellite imagery + manual trace
Site visit required	Yes (for photo capture)	No (aerial only workflow)
Output	3D model, measurements, materials estimate	Roof diagram, pitch, materials report
Insurance workflow	Yes (integrates with major carriers)	Yes (insurance-formatted reports)
Floor plan / GLA	No	No
Pricing	Per-project fees (varies by tier)	Subscription + per-report credits
Best for	Full exterior measurement + 3D model	Fast roof-only estimates from anywhere

When to choose Hover

You want a full exterior measurement — roof, siding, windows, doors — in one workflow
You are already visiting the job site and can capture photos
You need a 3D visual to share with homeowners or insurers
You work with insurance carriers that accept Hover reports directly

When to choose RoofSnap

You want a roof measurement before committing to a site visit
You are estimating a large volume of jobs and need speed
You primarily need roof area and pitch for material calculations
Your workflow is insurance claim focused with formatted PDF reports

What neither tool does

Both Hover and RoofSnap focus on the exterior — roof and siding. Neither is designed for measuring interior living area (GLA) for appraisal or listing purposes. If you need to calculate above-grade square footage from a floor plan for an appraisal or real estate transaction, that is a different workflow entirely.

Already have the floor plan?

PlanSnapper measures interior GLA from existing floor plan PDFs — a different problem from roof measurement, but one that comes up in the same appraisal and renovation context.

Get Started