Compare · 8 min read
CubiCasa vs Matterport: Which Should You Buy?
CubiCasa and Matterport are both widely used in residential real estate, but they serve different purposes at very different price points. If you're deciding between them, the right answer depends on what you actually need to deliver to clients.
The short version
- Buy CubiCasa if you need affordable, fast 2D floor plans for MLS listings or appraisals. No hardware. Pay per scan.
- Buy Matterport if your market expects immersive 3D virtual tours and you can justify the hardware investment with volume.
- Buy both if you do high-volume luxury work where tours and floor plans are both expected.
CubiCasa vs Matterport: at a glance
| CubiCasa | Matterport | |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware required | No (any smartphone) | Yes (Pro2/Pro3 or compatible camera) |
| Upfront cost | $0 | $2,700–$5,900 |
| Per-scan cost | $4–$9 | $15–$35+ plus monthly hosting |
| Output | 2D floor plan | 3D tour + 2D floor plan |
| ANSI GLA | Add-on available | Not available |
| Floor plan accuracy | Good (1–3%) | Good (AI-derived) |
| Best for | Appraisers, agents, photographers | Luxury listings, tech-forward markets |
The core difference
CubiCasa is a floor plan tool. Matterport is a 3D experience platform that also generates floor plans. That distinction matters when deciding what to buy.
If your clients and their buyers need a 2D floor plan with accurate room dimensions — for an MLS listing, an appraisal, or a property disclosure — CubiCasa delivers that faster and cheaper than Matterport. If your clients expect a virtual tour where buyers can walk through the home from their phone, Matterport is the standard.
Cost reality check
The Matterport Pro3 camera is ~$5,900. Add $69–$309/month for hosting active spaces plus $15–$35 per scan delivery. At low volume, a photographer would need many months of consistent bookings to break even on hardware alone.
CubiCasa has no hardware cost. At $4–$9 per scan, you can start generating floor plans on day one with your existing phone. For appraisers, the ANSI Z765 GLA add-on adds a small fee per property but is still far cheaper than any hardware-based solution.
Floor plan quality
Both tools produce floor plans accurate enough for MLS use and most appraisal applications. CubiCasa's output is a clean 2D plan with labeled rooms and exterior dimensions — exactly what most agents and appraisers need.
Matterport's floor plans are auto-generated from the 3D point cloud, which produces accurate geometry but can occasionally misread wall placement in complex spaces. Matterport floor plans are generally not used for GLA calculations in formal appraisals because they lack ANSI certification.
Who uses each
CubiCasa is used by residential appraisers, real estate photographers, and agents who need floor plans as part of a listing package. It's the practical, high-volume choice.
Matterport is used by photographers and agents serving luxury and upper-tier markets where 3D tours are expected. Many Matterport users also offer CubiCasa floor plans as a separate line item since Matterport's floor plans are not always sufficient for appraisal use.
Already have the floor plan?
If you already have a floor plan PDF from CubiCasa or Matterport and need to calculate or verify the GLA yourself, PlanSnapper lets you upload it, set the scale, and trace the perimeter to get an accurate square footage — without paying for an add-on report.
Related reading
- How to get square footage from a CubiCasa floor plan
- What is gross living area (GLA)?
- ANSI Z765 square footage standard explained
- Floor plan measurement tool for GLA calculation
- Matterport vs RoomSketcher — comparison
- Matterport vs Zillow 3d Home — comparison
- CubiCasa vs Matterport floor plans: which is better for square footage?
- FAQ: How to use CubiCasa, Matterport, or iGUIDE floor plans with PlanSnapper
- How to read a floor plan: symbols, scales, and dimensions
- Floor plan dimensions: how to read and use them for square footage
- Furniture floor plan: how to use one to verify room size